AS Senate Passes Resolution Condemning Anti-Semitism, One Senator Abstains


Bailee Abell
AS Beat Reporter
Photo by Frances Castellon, Staff Photographer

 The University of California, Santa Barbara Associated Students Senate passed A Resolution Condemning Anti-Semitism at their April 1 meeting. The resolution was passed with a roll call vote of 24-0-1; the one abstention was on-campus senator Steven Kwok.

“This resolution is really close to my heart,” said off-campus senator and author of the resolution Michelle Moreh. “I’ve grown up Jewish. It’s a huge part of my identity, and it’s been really difficult to come to campus and see so much anti-Semitism that affects us today. I hadn’t really been exposed to this much anti-Semitism until I got to UCSB.”

Moreh stated that recent occurrences of anti-Semitism on university campuses are what prompted her to write the resolution with Izeah Garcia. Among these anti-Semitic acts was the spray painting of swastikas on the chapter house of the Jewish fraternity Alpha Epsilon Pi at UC Davis one week after the university’s senate passed a resolution in favor of divestment from companies that profit from human rights violations in Palestine and Israel. Additionally, flyers claiming that the terrorist acts on Sept. 11, 2001 were a Jewish conspiracy were posted throughout the UCSB campus in Sept. 2014.

“As the university system that has been at the forefront of social justice… we still have swastikas being spray painted on Jewish fraternities at other UC schools,” said Moreh. “We still have student senators publicly endorsing the demise of the one Jewish state in the world, and we still have a candidate of UCLA’s judicial bored being discriminated against on the basis of her Jewish identity, and we still have flyers at UCSB blaming Jews for 9/11. So we should have done this after the first incident happened, we shouldn’t have waited for Jews to be targeted again.”

Third-year history and religious studies double major Arezu Hashemi shared her experiences with anti-Semitism, which compelled her to be a student sponsor of the resolution. Having grown up in a predominantly Jewish neighborhood, Hashemi stated that she had never experienced anti-Semitism as a child and therefore believed that it was “a thing of the past.”

“I used to wear a golden star of David necklace around my neck,” said Hashemi. “One day, I was stopped on the street by an older woman. She praised me for having the courage to wear my necklace with pride… It wasn’t until I stepped out of my bubble, out of my comfort zone, and onto the UCSB campus that I understood why she felt the way that she did.”

Hashemi stated that she had first encountered anti-Semitism during the spring of her freshman year, when she learned of the BDS movement. Since then, she has believed that anti-Semitism is detrimental to her life and well-being on the UCSB campus.

“For the first time in my life, I felt that my identity, an unchangeable part of who I am, was under attack and my entire existence as a Jew was being questioned,” said Hashemi. “No one in this room can look at this past year’s incidents and tell me that anti-Semitism doesn’t exist… I don’t wear that star of David necklace anymore. I don’t tell most people that I’m Jewish, and I definitely don’t tell them that I’m pro-Israel. I actively hide these things because I’m scared. Forget the fact that people treat me differently, forget the fact that I’m subjected to racial remarks and slurs. I’m scared for my safety.”

UCSB Alpha Epsilon Pi chapter president and student sponsor of the resolution Daniel Lifton also spoke on behalf of the resolution, stating that he is “truly fearful” of the AEPi chapter house becoming a target for anti-Semitic acts.

“As the Associated Student body, you are a representative for us all, and this resolution proves that you stand in arms against any anti-Semitic act,” said Lifton.

The resolution was moved to Immediate Consideration where it was discussed further. Numerous senators agreed with the passage of the resolution, however Kwok opined that due to the impromptu nature of the resolution, he would rather wait one week to vote on it.

“Because I feel that the issue of anti-Semitism is so intricately linked to the BDS movement because… every time these issues have been brought up they have been brought up together, I would feel much more comfortable if we tabled this resolution for one week,” said Kwok. “We can give all of ourselves more time to consider the various repercussions that could happen if we decide to [vote on] this resolution today. We all do have differing [opinions] of these policies.”

Despite Kwok’s opposition, the resolution was brought to a roll-call vote and was passed by 24 votes, with zero opposed and Kwok as the only abstention.

Bailee Abell is a third-year English major and the Executive Content Editor at The Bottom Line. She has been with TBL since her freshman year, first as a staff writer and then as the Associated Students Beat Reporter, when she became known for her investigative reporting of the UCSB student government. She was hired as Executive Content Editor in Spring 2015 and hopes to use her year as ECE to improve the image, coverage, and foster a stronger sense of community for TBL. She can be found in local coffee shops and sunny places, either editing articles, reading novels or watching reruns of Gilmore Girls, but rarely without a coffee in hand. Her blog is at


  1. So if we held a vote on condemning racism, would Kwok abstain?

    If we held a vote on condemning lynching, would Kwok abstain?

    If we held a vote on condemning genocide, would Kwok abstain?

  2. Let’s not forget that the flyer condemning Jews for 9/11 was discovered and reported by a Muslim student. One person commenting on this fact said that the Muslim student was an exception and said something to the effect of, “Why can’t they all be like that?”

    Antisemitism may still show up on campus (I can attest to this, having been the victim of anti-Semitic hate speech), but we should also recognize other forms of hatred casually spread around campus. Islamophobia, for example. And we as Jews should never, ever use our (hopefully universal) condemnation of antisemitism as a pretext to silence condemnation of apartheid and other despicable and internationally-illegal acts of the Israeli government or any government.

  3. “And we as Jews should never, ever use our (hopefully universal) condemnation of antisemitism as a pretext to silence condemnation of apartheid and other despicable and internationally-illegal acts of the Israeli government or any government.”

    Of course, any such condemnations would have to be based on truth, as opposed to BDS propaganda. Given your use of the “apartheid” slander, you clearly have a lot of research to do.