<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vanity Sizing: How Clothing Stores Affect Health by Christina Ly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebottomline.as.ucsb.edu/2008/12/vanity-sizing-how-clothing-stores-affect-health-by-christina-ly/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebottomline.as.ucsb.edu/2008/12/vanity-sizing-how-clothing-stores-affect-health-by-christina-ly</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 17:16:16 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Bailey</title>
		<link>http://thebottomline.as.ucsb.edu/2008/12/vanity-sizing-how-clothing-stores-affect-health-by-christina-ly/comment-page-1#comment-12531</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebottomline.as.ucsb.edu/?p=285#comment-12531</guid>
		<description>The British Standards Institute has drafted a solution to this problem. The new labels, described under BS-EN13402, have a pictogram with actual measurements in centimeters. In order for this to work, we will need to be honest with ourselves about our body size. We also need to be comfortable with the use of metric units, as I was as early as 1975. I was 8 years old then and eager to learn the metric system. Perhaps even too eager. The new labels would work where the resulting big numbers are OK, or at least not scary, and metric is normally used. It will not work in the USA, which does not normally use metric, and many are literally dying to be thin. Anyone afraid of having 2-digit clothing sizes would be terrified by the new labels, which would often run into the triple digits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The British Standards Institute has drafted a solution to this problem. The new labels, described under BS-EN13402, have a pictogram with actual measurements in centimeters. In order for this to work, we will need to be honest with ourselves about our body size. We also need to be comfortable with the use of metric units, as I was as early as 1975. I was 8 years old then and eager to learn the metric system. Perhaps even too eager. The new labels would work where the resulting big numbers are OK, or at least not scary, and metric is normally used. It will not work in the USA, which does not normally use metric, and many are literally dying to be thin. Anyone afraid of having 2-digit clothing sizes would be terrified by the new labels, which would often run into the triple digits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
